Oleksandr Klymenko will be the new head of the anti-corruption prosecutor's office.
competition and approved the position of NABU detective Oleksandr Klymenko.
The commission made this decision at a meeting on Tuesday, July 19. Documents for the approval of the winner of the competition will be submitted to the Office of the Prosecutor General for approval.
Oleksandr Klymenko was born in 1986, graduated from the National Law Academy named after Yaroslav the Wise in Kharkiv.
In March 2010, he started working in the internal affairs bodies in Kyiv.
Since 2015, Oleksandr Klymenko worked as a senior an investigator in the National Police. In March 2016, Klymenko took part in the competition for the National Anti-Corruption Bureau and became a detective, then a senior detective, and in November 2017 – the head of the department.
While working at NABU, he investigated the cases of ex-deputy Oleksandr Onishchenko, ex-head of the State Fiscal Service Roman Nasirov, and current deputy head of the Office of the President Oleg Tatarov, who is responsible for the referral of law enforcement agencies. He is also the senior member of the group of prosecutors in the case of ex-Deputy Secretary of the National Security Council Oleg Hladkovskyi.
Read also: On the OP website, an announcement about the July 19 election of the head of the SAP appeared and disappeared: Shabunin says that Ukraine is being made a laughing stock
We remind you that on December 24the commission for the election of the head of the SAPfor the second time could not approvecompetition results, according to which NABU detective Oleksandr Klymenko won. In fact, the commission refused to confirm its own scores given to candidates during the interviews. The reason for the sabotage was Bankova's desire to see the loyal prosecutor Andrii Sinyuk in the chair of the head of the SAP, and not the detective Klymenko, who led the investigation into the corruption of the deputy head of the President's OfficeOleg Tatarov.
They tried to disrupt the competition more than once: commission members loyal to the OPU asked the Prosecutor General's Office to provide existing documents; did not come to the meeting to disrupt the quorum; did not give the votes needed to approve the winner.
On the eve of the final stage of the competition, OASK decided to cancel the work procedure of the competition commission “in connection with changes in the legislation”. Judge Olexii Ogurtsov referred to a non-existent provision of the law, and was also guided by only one edition of the law from 2015, ignoring the changes.
