Poroshenko commented on Medvedchuk's testimony

The defense of the fifth president accused the SBU of putting pressure on the court, as a hearing on their client's case is scheduled for today.

Petro Poroshenko's lawyer Igor Golovan said that the testimony Viktor Medvedchuk's involvement of the fifth president of Ukraine in the purchase of gas by L/DNR militants and the withdrawal of the Samara-Western direction oil pipeline from state ownership is a “PR campaign by the Security Service of Ukraine.” He told about it to “Public”.

“In our opinion, what the SBU is doing is exclusively PR. First, it is not their business, the DBR should do it. And what the SBU says about it confirms that there is nothing to do with the truth and the law. “, – Golovan stressed.

He believes that Medvedchuk's testimony was made public only through court hearings in Poroshenko's case.

“A court hearing on the seizure of Petro Poroshenko's property is scheduled for today. This is normal pressure on the court,” the lawyer concluded.

Read also: Poroshenko commented on Putin's offer of political asylum in Russia

The godfather of Russian dictator Viktor Medvedchuk testified against the fifth president of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko, which was later published by the SBU. It concerns the involvement of the latter in the withdrawal from state ownership of part of the main oil pipeline “Samara – Western direction” in order to further pump diesel fuel through it, and the purchase of coal in the “L/DNR”.

What is inside this lawsuit and what it could mean for the country, read in the material Inna Vedernikova “Poroshenko's case. Inside and out” , and about prospects of this investigation and possible consequences, read in the materials Alexander Shulga “On the trajectory of crises. From” Minsk “to early presidential elections?” and Vitaliy Shabunin “Forecast-2022: what events to expect on the anti-corruption front” .

See the special topic: Poroshenko arrived for interrogation in the DBR: “There will be no cooperation on my part” The DBR reported that Poroshenko left the interrogation without signing the protocol. Poroshenko's lawyers oppose his cross-examination with Medvedchuk Lawyers are convinced that the main purpose of the cross-examination is a picture of Petro Poroshenko and Viktor Medvedchuk entering the DBR together, to “then tell that they are together.” Poroshenko's appeal against the measure of restraint postponed The meeting was scheduled for two weeks. The DBR has announced a new date for Poroshenko's interrogation The State Bureau also called on Poroshenko not to manipulate public opinion. The court announced the date of consideration of the appeal against Poroshenko's precautionary measure The composition of the court is also already known.

Based on materials: ZN.ua

Share This Post