“Amnesty” is argued the need to fill the budget during the war.
Bill on Amendments to the Criminal Code “On Dismissal from criminal liability during martial law with voluntary compensation “will actually cause more damage than benefit the budget, says the head of the Center for Combating Corruption Vitaly Shabunin.
“The real unity of the EU factions and the Servants was caused by the desire to release the top corrupt officials from punishment. In simple language, the country's key corrupt officials are being asked to avoid responsibility if they compensate for the damage caused by the crime (before the war), “he wrote, stressing that Bill 333333 was jointly submitted by rivals of European Solidarity and Servants of the People. >
In particular, the amendment is proposed to be applied to criminal offenses under Articles 191 (misappropriation, misappropriation or seizure of property through abuse of office), 209 (legalization of proceeds of crime), 364 (abuse of power or official position) and 367 (negligence).
The adoption of this bill will allow the participants of the top NABU cases, such as in the case of Privatbank, Rotterdam, Gazova and others, to pay only part of the loot instead of the actual punishment.
“For example, $ 250 million in losses have been recorded in the Privat case so far, but more than $ 5 billion has actually been stolen (which is why it is the subject of another discussion and the result of numerous obstacles in the examination). That is, deputies offer Kolomoisky to sell a part of his real estate or yacht and forget about the claims of NABU and SAP. And if the case is actually considered, we could confiscate ALL the assets of the defendants and the latter would be forced to serve a real prison sentence, “Shabunin writes.
then the ransom of the latter should be much higher.
“For example, compensation for the established losses in the amount of three times, as well as the mandatory delivery of benefits to the investigation. And all this has to be fixed by the agreement with the prosecutor. Without these minimum requirements, the bill looks like an attempt to use the war for the amnesty of corrupt allies, “the head of the CPC added.
In particular, they deliberately blocked the competition for the election of the head of the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office.
Is it only because of the war that the Cabinet of Ministers keeps the competition for the NABU director frozen? Will the NABU staff withstand the intervention of “others” and why is the future head of the SAP so important for the work of the anti-corruption bloc? Answers, as well as an interview with a NABU detective, who talks about what the anti-corruption bloc expects from the government to help it not lose the country of corruption – in the text of Inna Vedernikova « NABU test . Is Zelensky ready to open a second front against corruption? »
