The register of court decisions is now closed.
Fugitive Viktor Yanukovych, who is in hiding in Russia, sued the Kyiv District Administrative Court against the Verkhovna Rada for the second time in January. Yanukovych, convicted of treason in absentia, wanted to regain his presidency through a lawsuit against parliament.
Olga Sovhyrya, a representative of the Verkhovna Rada in the Constitutional Court, said that Yanukovych had demanded that the UACC recognize the Ukrainian parliament's lack of power to revoke the title of President of Ukraine through a procedure other than impeachment. The Verkhovna Rada deprived Yanukovych of the title of President of Ukraine due to the adopted and current law of February 4, 2015. № 144-VIII.
that the court's decision on this lawsuit can be made at almost any time.
The constitutionality of this law has already been challenged in the Constitutional Court, but in December 2019 the CCU closed the proceedings on this constitutional petition. The CCU noted that this dispute is not within the jurisdiction of the Court because it is not legal, but political in nature.
Sources ZN.UA reported that on April 20, 2022, Judge of the Kyiv District Administrative Court Yevhen Ablov refused to satisfy the requests of the Verkhovna Rada to close the proceedings and transfer the case to the Administrative Court of Cassation within the Supreme Court. The judge granted the motion to dismiss the case. The judge decided to leave Yanukovych's administrative proceedings on the admission of lack of authority without consideration. The court decision, in accordance with Part 2 of Article 256 of the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine, takes legal effect from the moment of its signing by the judge. It could be appealed to the appellate court within 15 days.
Immediately after him, on April 21, 2022, Judge Ihor Kachur granted the request of the representative of the Verkhovna Rada to leave the claim without consideration. The judge dismissed the administrative lawsuit N640/34786/21 on Yanukovych's lawsuit to the parliament about the lack of competence of the subject of power. According to the first part of Article 256 of the Code of Administrative Procedure, the decision came into force immediately after its signing. The decision could be appealed to the appellate court within 15 days.
The Unified State Register of Judgments is closed. We remind you that Sovhyrya announced the filing of Yanukovych's lawsuits, but did not report the refusal.
A year has passed since President Zelensky's decree to liquidate the UASK . The relevant bill is also in the relevant committee. Moreover, inconsistencies in recent statements by Deputy Chairman of the OPU Andriy Smirnov and Chairman of the Supreme Court Vsevolod Knyazev seem nonsense. While the first claims that the UACC is securely blocked, the second in an interview with ZN.UA stressed that OASK accepts lawsuits and makes decisions .
ZN.UA has already addressed the chairman profile parliamentary committee Andriy Kostin with a request to consider and clarify this stalemate for the warring state and its judicial system.
The fact that the Cabinet of Ministers violated the law on NABU could be overlooked. However, according to a source ZN.UA in the Cabinet of Ministers, Bankova still has options to neutralize Uglava as the right hand of the long-unwanted Sitnik.
Why is the UACC here and why did one of Sitnik's candidates take the lawsuit there? Is it only because of the war that the Cabinet of Ministers is holding a competition for the director of NABU in a frozen state? Will the NABU staff withstand the intervention of “others” and why is the future head of the SAP so important for the work of the anti-corruption bloc?
Answers, as well as interview with the NABU detective, who talks about what the anti-corruption bloc expects from the government to help it not lose the country of corruption – in the text Inna Vedernikova “ NABU test. Is Zelensky ready to open a second front against corruption? ”.
